top of page
  • Christopher D.

Arkansas Marijuana Lawsuit: Navigating the Crossroads of Regulation and Commercial Speech


Arkansas finds itself at a legal crossroads as Pulaski County Circuit Judge Chip Welch contemplates a ruling that could potentially reshape the advertising landscape for the state's medical marijuana industry. This lawsuit, spearheaded by Good Day Farm, a cultivation company, challenges the constitutionality of advertising restrictions imposed on marijuana cultivators and dispensaries. 


As the legal battle unfolds, it raises questions about the delicate balance between regulatory oversight and the businesses' right to protected commercial speech. In this blog post, we explore the intricacies of the lawsuit and its potential impact on marijuana advertising regulations in Arkansas.


Unpacking the Lawsuit

The legal saga began when Good Day Farm filed a lawsuit last year, contending that the state's advertising restrictions infringe upon the businesses' constitutional right to protected commercial speech. Central to the case is the argument that these limitations are unconstitutional, with the state overstepping its bounds in regulating the medical marijuana industry.


Circuit Judge Welch, in a prior ruling, emphasized that the state Legislature lacked authority to alter the constitutional amendment approved by voters in 2016. This ruling struck down 27 modifications made by lawmakers, setting the stage for the current legal battle. Attorney General Tim Griffin, expressing intent to appeal, faced procedural hurdles that delayed the process, leaving the case in a state of legal limbo.


Commercial Speech and Constitutional Rights

The heart of the matter revolves around the standard set by the U.S. Supreme Court and the state Supreme Court regarding the regulation of commercial speech. This standard introduces a series of criteria: the speech must concern lawful activity, there must be a substantial government interest in regulating the speech, the regulations must advance the government’s interest, and the regulations must be no more extensive than necessary.


Noah Watson, representing the state agency defendants, argued that marijuana's illegal status under federal law renders the speech of marijuana businesses unprotected. Watson contended that cultivators are restricted from marketing directly to the general public because federal law prohibits such transactions. However, cultivators are permitted to market their products to dispensaries, which act as intermediaries between cultivators and the end consumers.


Additionally, dispensaries face stringent regulations, such as restrictions on television, radio, print, or internet advertising unless reliable evidence indicates that no more than 30% of the audience comprises individuals under the age of 18. The state justifies these regulations as a means of protecting children from exposure to marijuana-related content.


Unpacking the Arguments

Attorney Gary Marts, representing Good Day Farm, challenged the state's position, asserting that cannabis businesses' speech is protected since cannabis is legal on the state level and effectively legal federally. Marts pointed out that Congress, since 2014, has prohibited the U.S. Department of Justice from using funds to enforce federal cannabis laws in states where cannabis is legal under state law.


Marts also emphasized the seeming hypocrisy in the state's stance, opposing cannabis while simultaneously regulating the industry and benefiting from substantial tax revenue exceeding $100 million. Drawing a parallel, he mentioned that Budweiser advertises in Arkansas without being a licensed retailer in the state. Marts argued that this highlights the inconsistency in the state's approach to advertising restrictions.


The debate between Watson and Marts raises essential questions about the nuanced intersection between state and federal legality, the protection of commercial speech, and the delicate balancing act required to regulate an industry that operates within the evolving landscape of cannabis legislation.


The Implications of the Lawsuit

As the courtroom drama unfolds, the implications of the lawsuit extend beyond the immediate legal confines. A ruling favoring Good Day Farm could pave the way for a reevaluation of advertising regulations, potentially offering more leeway for marijuana businesses to communicate with consumers. This could have significant repercussions for the industry, enabling businesses to engage with the public more freely.


The legal journey is far from over. Judge Welch has called for additional briefs from both parties, indicating his intention to rule by the end of the year. The outcome of this case will not only shape the advertising landscape in Arkansas but may also serve as a precedent for similar legal battles in other states navigating the complex terrain of marijuana legislation.


Why Medical Marijuana Matters

In the midst of this legal turbulence, the question of why medical marijuana remains a compelling choice for patients looms large. Arkansas' medical marijuana program, despite legal challenges, offers patients a regulated and structured approach to accessing cannabis products for medicinal purposes. Obtaining a medical marijuana card ensures that patients have a reliable channel for their healthcare needs, with professional guidance and access to quality, regulated products.


It's essential for patients and industry stakeholders to remain informed about the legal landscape and understand the potential changes that may arise from lawsuits like the one currently underway in Arkansas. The medical marijuana program provides a pathway for patients to navigate through the evolving regulatory environment, emphasizing the importance of a medical card in ensuring a secure and regulated supply of medicinal cannabis.


Balancing Act in Cannabis Advertising

As Arkansas awaits a pivotal ruling that could redefine marijuana advertising regulations, the state finds itself at the crossroads of regulatory scrutiny and the constitutional rights of businesses. The delicate balance between protecting children from potential harm and allowing businesses the freedom of commercial speech underscores the complexity of regulating the evolving marijuana industry. 


Whether the outcome favors more lenient advertising regulations or upholds existing restrictions, the legal battle serves as a crucial chapter in the ongoing narrative of cannabis legalization and regulation.


Get Your Medical Marijuana Card Today!

Medical marijuana is legal in Arkansas, and we can help you renew your medical card TODAY! If you qualify for your renewal, give us a call and we can help!


You need your medical card to access any of Arkansas’ medical dispensaries. Not to worry, because it is now easier than ever to renew your card with Arkansas Marijuana Card!


Telemedicine makes it easy for you to renew your card from the comfort of your own home!


Schedule an appointment with one of our physicians to get started today!


 

Doctors Who Care

Relief You Can Trust


Here at Arkansas Marijuana Card, we aim to help everyone achieve wellness safely and conveniently through increased access to medical marijuana. Our focus on education, inclusion, and acceptance will reduce the stigma for our patients by providing equal access to timely information and compassionate care.


Call us at (844)-249-8714 today, or book an appointment here.

32 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page